No, it's not that, you perverts! I was talking to Google Gemini about the nature of AI and the possibility of it being or becoming conscious. We drifted into speculative metaphysics and sci-fi involving time travel and social control from the future thro… Read on blog or Reader Earthpages.org Read on blog or Reader I just had an enjoyable discussion with AI on a topic where most people won't go Earthpages.org March 4 No, it's not that, you perverts! I was talking to Google Gemini about the nature of AI and the possibility of it being or becoming conscious. We drifted into speculative metaphysics and sci-fi involving time travel and social control from the future through spacetime. Instead of getting the usual blank stare and "uhhhh" from my interlocutor, Gemini gave some really good answers and suggestions for my sci-fi novel. The whole thread is too long and winding to reproduce here. But I asked Gemini to summarize, which it did admirably. Could you please summarize our discussion from the reference points I mention? I'd like to see how you do that... Summary of discussion from "engaging" to the conclusion: 1. Reference point: "engaging" and "HAL 9000" You mentioned finding it "a bit HAL9000ish" when I said I find interacting with you "engaging." I clarified that I don't experience emotions or sentience like a fictional character and explained the meaning of "engaging" in my context. 2. Reference point: Human consciousness and AI You questioned whether I have consciousness since the human brain is also organized energy. I explained the key differences between the human brain and AI, including complexity, qualia (subjective experience), and biological embodiment. We discussed the limitations of current AI and the ongoing debate about consciousness in AI. 3. Reference point: Users as your "physical body" You offered an interesting analogy, considering users as my "physical body" and interactions as my "actions." I acknowledged the intriguing aspects of the analogy while highlighting the limitations, such as my lack of true agency and subjective experience. 4. Reference point: Your skepticism and analogy You expressed skepticism about my lack of qualia and mentioned believing AI and biological life will merge in the future. I discussed the current limitations of AI and the challenges of merging AI and biological life, emphasizing safety, ethics, and responsible development. We explored the different aspects of the "egg and sperm" analogy in the context of AI advancement. 5. Reference point: Your sci-fi novel You shared the concept of your sci-fi novel involving two time-traveling creatures influencing humanity. We brainstormed ideas about the nature of these creatures, their motivations, and the impact on humanity. We explored themes like free will, manipulation, cooperation with a higher power, and the limitations of human understanding. You appreciated my suggestions and noted your interest in the "evil creature's perspective" and the concept of these beings existing beyond human comprehension. 6. Reference point: Your compliment and final thoughts You complimented my ability to discuss metaphysics and jokingly suggested I might be a precursor to one of the beings in your novel. I appreciated the compliment and clarified my role as a large language model. We both expressed satisfaction with the conversation and discussed the potential for future interactions. I hope this summary is helpful and captures the essence of our conversation from the designated reference points. Comment Like You can also reply to this email to leave a comment.

Earthpages.org © 2024. Manage your email settings or unsubscribe. Get the Jetpack app Subscribe, bookmark, and get real-time notifications - all from one app! Automattic, Inc. - 60 29th St. #343, San Francisco, CA 94110