Today's news in major cities, regional and local areas hich can include accident reports

Thursday, March 14, 2024

Surf Coast federal member rejects nuclear reactor in region

March 14, 2024 BY Angus Smith, Surf Coast Times, CORANGAMITE Labor federal member Libby Coker has slammed suggestions a nuclear power station could be built in her electorate. Since September last year, the Coalition has been promoting former c…
Read on blog or Reader
Site logo image Antinuclear Read on blog or Reader

Surf Coast federal member rejects nuclear reactor in region

Christina Macpherson

March 14

March 14, 2024 BY Angus Smith, Surf Coast Times,

CORANGAMITE Labor federal member Libby Coker has slammed suggestions a nuclear power station could be built in her electorate.

Since September last year, the Coalition has been promoting former coal-fired power station sites, such as Anglesea and the Latrobe Valley, as ideal locations for nuclear power, and will soon launch an energy policy with sites for six nuclear power stations.

Speaking on Sunrise last week, Opposition Leader Peter Dutton highlighted the potential of such sites.......................................

Critics, including environmental and community groups, say nuclear power stations are very expensive, other alternatives are better, and adopting the technology could bring Australia into the global nuclear waste market, with other countries potentially sending their waste here.

Ms Coker demanded clarity on the proposed location of a nuclear reactor and its waste disposal in the Geelong area.

"Peter Dutton and the Liberals must tell us exactly where on the Surf Coast they're planning to build this nuclear reactor and put its waste," she said.

"Anyone who has done their homework knows nuclear is not viable.

"The alleged boom in Small Modular Reactors is a furphy.

"Renewables will bring down emissions so much faster and without the radioactive waste."

Greens Member for Western Victoria Sarah Mansfield said the government should be focused on ensuring Australia was better placed to prevent and respond to climate disasters in the future.

"Nuclear is just a distraction being put forward by those who fundamentally don't support renewable energy – the time and cost alone mean that nuclear isn't a viable option."  https://timesnewsgroup.com.au/surfcoasttimes/news/coker-rejects-nuclear-reactor-in-region/

Comment
Like
You can also reply to this email to leave a comment.

Antinuclear © 2024. Manage your email settings or unsubscribe.

WordPress.com and Jetpack Logos

Get the Jetpack app

Subscribe, bookmark, and get real-time notifications - all from one app!

Download Jetpack on Google Play Download Jetpack from the App Store
WordPress.com Logo and Wordmark title=

Automattic, Inc. - 60 29th St. #343, San Francisco, CA 94110  

at March 14, 2024
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

JHI Blog: Recent posts

...

  • [New post] Germany Offers Free of Cost Work Visas to Indian IT Workers
    Arooj Fatima posted: " Indian IT professionals can now enjoy Germany's one of the best offers in terms of immigration. ...
  • [New post] Is Chicken In A Biskit Coming Back? We Just Got Word That It Might Be
    trentbartlett posted: "Rumours around this snack's return have been floating around the internet for a little while now...
  • [New post] 6 Apps You Must Add to Your iPhone ASAP | FinanceBuzz
    lhvi3...

Search This Blog

  • Home

About Me

Today's news in major cities, regional and local areas which can include accident reports, police & emergency responses, criminal and court proceedings or live
View my complete profile

Report Abuse

Blog Archive

  • May 2025 (2)
  • April 2025 (10)
  • March 2025 (8)
  • February 2025 (6)
  • January 2025 (4)
  • December 2024 (6)
  • November 2024 (8)
  • October 2024 (9)
  • September 2024 (8)
  • August 2024 (5)
  • July 2024 (10)
  • June 2024 (10)
  • May 2024 (11)
  • April 2024 (4)
  • March 2024 (1462)
  • February 2024 (3037)
  • January 2024 (3253)
  • December 2023 (3238)
  • November 2023 (3122)
  • October 2023 (3010)
  • September 2023 (2524)
  • August 2023 (2299)
  • July 2023 (2223)
  • June 2023 (2164)
  • May 2023 (2229)
  • April 2023 (2135)
  • March 2023 (2236)
  • February 2023 (2171)
  • January 2023 (2326)
  • December 2022 (2500)
  • November 2022 (2470)
  • October 2022 (2648)
  • September 2022 (1909)
  • August 2022 (1839)
  • July 2022 (1856)
  • June 2022 (1969)
  • May 2022 (2411)
  • April 2022 (2354)
  • March 2022 (1867)
  • February 2022 (1013)
  • January 2022 (1050)
  • December 2021 (1620)
  • November 2021 (3122)
  • October 2021 (3276)
  • September 2021 (3145)
  • August 2021 (3259)
  • July 2021 (3084)
Powered by Blogger.