What Question Were You Investigating?
This is a perspective article that is prompted by issues regarding the quality of stored Red Blood Cells (RBCs) and the lack of good assessment prior to their transfusion. Specifically, we and others posit that stored RBCs, under current practices, are not always safe to transfuse due to donor, time, and processing factors. This is especially problematic for critically ill patients, those on chronic transfusion regimens, and surgeries where large volumes of RBCs are transfused.
Accordingly, we have, in this perspective, highlighted the lack of quantitative assessment of stored RBCs before transfusion on a unit-by-unit basis, a notable failure in this era of personalized medicine. We foresee that, over the next decade, state-of-the-art technologies such as -omics and machine learning can be combined to first identify a set of key quantitative quality metrics (i.e., a quality index) for stored RBCs. These quality indices can then guide lab-on-a-chip platforms armed with novel biosensors to continuously monitor stored RBC quality and then match the properties of the RBC unit to the needs of the patient.
If you enjoy the content we create and would like to support us, please consider becoming a patron on Patreon! By joining our community, you'll gain access to exclusive perks such as early access to our latest content, behind-the-scenes updates, and the ability to submit questions and suggest topics for us to cover. Your support will enable us to continue creating high-quality content and reach a wider audience.
Join us on Patreon today and let's work together to create more amazing content! https://www.patreon.com/ScientificInquirer
What Were Your Findings?
What makes this article unique is the wide breadth of authors representing the different stakeholders that will ultimately contribute to the solutions proposed in the perspective article. Specifically, we have recruited experts from hematology, transfusion medicine, blood storage and biopreservation, -omics, engineering and life sciences, global health, and ethics who represent both academic and industrial points of view.
Lab-on-a-chip technologies can ensure a more successful transfusion workflow by enabling objective assessment of stored RBC units using quality metrics identified by -omics and machine learning, thus ushering in a new era of precision transfusion medicine. Addressing the potential and challenges of precision transfusion medicine will facilitate the proposed convergent future whereby each stored RBC unit is assessed prior to transfusion via a quality index. This will require all stakeholders (including experts in blood banking, biopreservation, transfusion medicine, -omics, machine learning, bioengineering, ethics, regulation, and ultimately patients) to participate in multidisciplinary discussions and collaborations rather than their current isolated efforts. This Perspective – where we have a diverse team of such stakeholders – is a step towards this envisioned era of precision in transfusion medicine.
What Are the Clinical Implications?
Our envisioned workflow, discussed in this perspective, was conceived for safer (less adverse effects and complications) and more efficacious transfusion. As noted, lack of quality assessment of stored RBCs can be especially problematic for critically ill patients, those on chronic transfusion regimens, and surgeries where large volumes of RBCs are transfused. Thus, if the envisioned workflows are realized, they would represent a momentous step forward for patient safety.
What Are the Next Steps?
This perspective was written by a consortium of authors representing different stakeholders with the goal of envisioning and creating a better future for transfusion medicine safety with the use of advanced technologies. As such, our next steps are to create interactive forums (conferences and workgroups) to engage and mobilize a larger number of stakeholders to realize the envisioned goals outlined in this perspective.
IMAGE CREDIT: NASA.

ON SALE! Charles Darwin Signature T-shirt - "I think." Two words that changed science and the world, scribbled tantalizingly in Darwin's Transmutation Notebooks.
Processing…
Success! You're on the list.
Whoops! There was an error and we couldn't process your subscription. Please reload the page and try again.
No comments:
Post a Comment