Today's news in major cities, regional and local areas hich can include accident reports

Thursday, March 14, 2024

Refuting Peter Dutton’s recycled nuclear contamination

By Michelle Pini | 14 March 2024,  https://independentaustralia.net/politics/politics-display/peter-duttons-recycled-nuclear-contamination,1841 Nuclear power is one hell of a way to boil water.~ Albert Einstein MANY AUSTRALIANS are accu…
Read on blog or Reader
Site logo image Antinuclear Read on blog or Reader

Refuting Peter Dutton's recycled nuclear contamination

Christina Macpherson

March 14

By Michelle Pini | 14 March 2024,  https://independentaustralia.net/politics/politics-display/peter-duttons-recycled-nuclear-contamination,1841

Nuclear power is one hell of a way to boil water.
~ Albert Einstein

MANY AUSTRALIANS are accustomed to the Coalition's deliberate lies and obfuscation on most issues, which is why they are no longer in power, at least for now.

The lengths to which the "friendly" media's ongoing Right-wing public relations campaign is prepared to go in support of such obvious nonsensical blathering is, however, alarming.

In recent days, Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has been running free all over the countryside spruiking nuclear energy. Who cares?  We hear you say. Well, apparently, every mainstream media platform, since they are not only publicising his outright lies, but in many cases, promoting them as credible policy.

Despite the current political state of play in Australia, in which the Labor Party has been elected federally and in every mainland state and territory, plus his "popularity" continuing to dwindle towards complete extinction, Peter Dutton appears mired to the outdated policies of generations past.

After yet another election loss, this time in the Dunkley by-election, Dutton has sprung up on every media platform, keeping the climate denial fires burning and rambling about nuclear as if it were a new idea, rather than the stale, worn-out dance with annihilation that it actually is.

According to Pete, nuclear is: 

"...The only credible pathway we have to our international commitments to net zero by 2050."

And proving yet again that facts never stood in the way of a good PR campaign, the Fourth Estate say: Facts be damned! We already had to (mostly) give up on climate denial so let's give nuclear a good old-fashioned, vested-interests-funded, radioactive show of support!

This week, the usual suspects flooded our screens, radio waves and Google searches with headlines such as:

'Nuclear will help Australia reduce emissions by 2050' ~ Sky News

'Shadow Energy Minister Ted O'Brien floats 10-year timeframe to get nuclear up and running in Australia'  ~ The West Australian

And the winner of the Most Creative Bullshit Headline award, once again, goes to that much-awarded Murdoch rag...

'There's no rational reason for maintaining the nuclear ban'  ~ The Australian

We may currently have a Labor Government, which has canned nuclear energy, but the media barons' collective power to keep greenhouse gases spewing, corporate donors' pockets overflowing and public minds contaminated should not be underestimated.

And so in answer to the Coalition and its nuclear-friendly media disciples, here are a few, by no means exhaustive, rational reasons to maintain Australia's nuclear ban, keep nuclear energy firmly out of the energy mix and out of everyone's backyard.

LIE #1: IT'S CHEAP

Even in the U.S., which boasts the biggest nuclear energy sector in the world, nuclear power costs have escalated. As recently as mid-2021, despite huge government subsidies, the target price for nuclear power increased by 53 per cent, to almost twice the price of utility-scale solar PV systems with battery storage.

Climate Change and Energy Minister Chris Bowen has estimated that the Coalition's nuclear plan will carry a price tag of $387 billion – 20 times more than Labor's current renewables investment fund – and would not be delivered before 2040. Nuclear energy, then, does not appear to be cost-effective.

LIE #2: IT'S QUICK

We (thankfully) don't have nuclear reactors in Australia and thus there is no established nuclear reactor industry in place.

Nonetheless, back in 2023, Dutton first claimed:

"New nuclear technologies can be plugged into existing grids and work immediately."

In their more recent ramblings, Dutton, his current Shadow Energy Minister Ted O'Brien and the unnamed "experts" to whom they refer claim Australia can have large nuclear reactors – magically – ready to go within ten years.

In the U.S., which boasts the largest nuclear industry in the world, it currently takes 19 years to achieve this.

According to Ted, the UAE produced a nuclear reactor from go to whoa in "ten years". In reality, however, even with the UAE being an autocracy with a command economy, where communities are not permitted to object to reactors in their backyards, it actually took 13 years.

But what's three extra years and a few more glow-in-the-dark communities between climate-denying friends?

Nuclear energy does not appear to be fast, either.

LIE #3: IT'S CLEAN AND GREEN

Even before we get to the radioactive leaks part of why nuclear power isn't "clean", there is the small matter of the Coalition's stated need to maintain coal-fired power stations until all these nuclear reactors magically emerge, which even in Dutton's plan, requires at least ten more years, but which based on the U.S. experience, we know will take more like 20.

This is, of course, at the heart of the Coalition's nuclear push. This is the reason the Coalition gets energetic (pardon the pun) about most things. Nuclear energy generation takes a long time to develop at great cost, which would prohibit further investment in renewables and necessitate the extension of coal-fired power stations, currently set to be phased out by 2040.

According to its own Nuclear Regulatory Commission, in 2017, out of 61 operating – and self-regulating – nuclear power plant sites in the United States, 43 have had leaks or spills involving groundwater contamination above the EPA's safe drinking water threshold. 

So, nuclear energy does not appear to be "clean" or "green" or, as we indicate below, safe.

LIE #4: IT'S SAFE

There is still no answer to nuclear waste disposal or the toxic bi-products of nuclear storage. There is no safe way of "recycling" it.

There is still no answer to the "management" of radioactive leaks. 

Nuclear waste, depending on its elemental composition, takes between 290 to a few hundred billion years to decompose. High-level nuclear waste consisting of spent fuel from nuclear reactors – of the type Peter Dutton and co would like to build – accounts for most radioactive waste and needs to be safely stored for up to a million years. 

And then there are unplanned natural disasters, such as Fukushima.

As Dave Sweeney recently explained on IA, despite its established technical sophistication and even after 13 years, the best Japan can do with Fukushima's ongoing radioactive waste is 'pump and dump'  it into our oceans. 

LIE #5: THE LIGHTS WILL GO OUT

According to self-styled nuclear energy mastermind Ted O'Brien, if we "prematurely" shut down coal-fired energy generators and implement nuclear reactors right now, "the lights will go out".

Unsurprisingly, there is no factual basis for this claim. However, the lights may well go out if we do as his party is suggesting since natural disasters affecting nuclear reactors on a scale like Fukushima cannot be anticipated or prevented. Then there's the "slight" problem of global warming, which, if we continue to accelerate by burning fossil fuels, will, indeed, result in all the lights going out.

To sum up – rationally – we repeat, nuclear power isn't safe, it's not cost-effective and it certainly ain't green, unless you count glowing in the dark.

Comment
Like
You can also reply to this email to leave a comment.

Antinuclear © 2024. Manage your email settings or unsubscribe.

WordPress.com and Jetpack Logos

Get the Jetpack app

Subscribe, bookmark, and get real-time notifications - all from one app!

Download Jetpack on Google Play Download Jetpack from the App Store
WordPress.com Logo and Wordmark title=

Automattic, Inc. - 60 29th St. #343, San Francisco, CA 94110  

at March 14, 2024
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

JHI Blog: Recent posts

JHI Blog ...

  • [New post] Is Chicken In A Biskit Coming Back? We Just Got Word That It Might Be
    trentbartlett posted: "Rumours around this snack's return have been floating around the internet for a little while now...
  • [New post] Germany Offers Free of Cost Work Visas to Indian IT Workers
    Arooj Fatima posted: " Indian IT professionals can now enjoy Germany's one of the best offers in terms of immigration. ...
  • [New post] 6 Apps You Must Add to Your iPhone ASAP | FinanceBuzz
    lhvi3...

Search This Blog

  • Home

About Me

Today's news in major cities, regional and local areas which can include accident reports, police & emergency responses, criminal and court proceedings or live
View my complete profile

Report Abuse

Blog Archive

  • June 2025 (1)
  • May 2025 (3)
  • April 2025 (10)
  • March 2025 (8)
  • February 2025 (6)
  • January 2025 (4)
  • December 2024 (6)
  • November 2024 (8)
  • October 2024 (9)
  • September 2024 (8)
  • August 2024 (5)
  • July 2024 (10)
  • June 2024 (10)
  • May 2024 (11)
  • April 2024 (4)
  • March 2024 (1462)
  • February 2024 (3037)
  • January 2024 (3253)
  • December 2023 (3238)
  • November 2023 (3122)
  • October 2023 (3010)
  • September 2023 (2524)
  • August 2023 (2299)
  • July 2023 (2223)
  • June 2023 (2164)
  • May 2023 (2229)
  • April 2023 (2135)
  • March 2023 (2236)
  • February 2023 (2171)
  • January 2023 (2326)
  • December 2022 (2500)
  • November 2022 (2470)
  • October 2022 (2648)
  • September 2022 (1909)
  • August 2022 (1839)
  • July 2022 (1856)
  • June 2022 (1969)
  • May 2022 (2411)
  • April 2022 (2354)
  • March 2022 (1867)
  • February 2022 (1013)
  • January 2022 (1050)
  • December 2021 (1620)
  • November 2021 (3122)
  • October 2021 (3276)
  • September 2021 (3145)
  • August 2021 (3259)
  • July 2021 (3084)
Powered by Blogger.